Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First-party leads


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  11:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

First-party leads

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is very little to indicate this is a notable term. A search on google search results in no academic discussion of the term. There doesn't appear to be any discussion of this term in other reliable sources. Thenightaway (talk) 10:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: the whole article reads like a puff piece about Dealer.com CEO Mark Bonfigli. Definition #18 of sense 2 of the noun lead on Wiktionary already covers the primary DICDEF aspect. The rest here, as far as I can tell, is unsourced. Owen&times; &#9742;  18:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: upon closer inspection, the references to Dealer.com CEO Mark Bonfigli were placed there by User:Mark Bonfigli: and  - his only contributions to WP. Owen&times;  &#9742;  18:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Owen&times;  &#9742;  23:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.