Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sign of notability. Just a local church. Per Articles for deletion/Immanuel Lutheran Church (Hodgkins, Illinois). —DIYeditor (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:08, 23 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as church is historically and culturally significant to Rockingham County. The congregation was founded in 1841 and the building was built in the 1850s, including segregated seats for slaves and landowners. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:29, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Not listed at this North Carolina government site. Two First Baptist Churches are listed at National Register of Historic Places listings in Rockingham County, North Carolina but not in Madison or at this address. Supporting references should be added to establish notability of articles like this. —DIYeditor (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * It is by no means true that if a building is historic, it will necessarily be "listed."E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep material such as News & Observer: ''Madison church celebrates 170 years from which page can be improved exists. WP:TROUT Nom for lazy series of nominations of old churches without proper WP:BEFORE.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Lazy? If you click the search links above, neither news or newspapers (or books or etc.) turn up anything. You have found one source, after presumably more effort than is required by BEFORE. Multiple reliable secondary sources with significant coverage are required. This church actually turns up very little in searches - next to nothing. —DIYeditor (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:31, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The News & Record article Madison church celebrates 170 years article is a WP:RS, and the point is that it includes material from which article can be improved, and keywords that will enable keyword searches to find additional sources. Like most of our pages, this article about an old and notable church needs a willing editor to improve it.  note that the 19th century church was razed and replaced in the 1950s, but that while the present church is not architecturally interesting, material on the old building exists.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:24, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as has coverage in reliable sources as shown above passes WP:NBUILD Atlantic306 (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.