Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Kill (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tygers of Pan Tang. Consensus is that though the album exists and has been mentioned, the coverage is not detailed enough and/or mentioned in sufficient independent reliable sources to warrant a stand alone article. SilkTork (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

First Kill (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG and WP:NALBUM, asking for a redirect to the band's page. Contested redirect by. Cannot find anything suggesting notability per a before search. Nothing in the article contributes to GNG right now.  Just ' i ' yaya  15:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United Kingdom.  Just ' i ' yaya  15:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tygers of Pan Tang. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. A WP:BEFORE shows a handful of passing mentions in books. SBKSPP (talk) 22:47, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Now convinced with the sources added to the article by Kingofstillport. SBKSPP (talk) 01:30, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 22:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Keep or redirect - Keep, or redirect, but do not delete. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - To clarify I'm asking for a redirect per the 2021 RFC cited in WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT that says that contested blank and redirects should be taken to AFD  Just ' i ' yaya  00:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep It - Recently, I found credible sources that reviewed it and included their reviews and statements on the article page. Kingofstillport (talk) 04:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I saw your expansion of the article. I believe you've added sources to the article. To pass GNG, multiple (usually 2-3) reliable sources that are independent of the subject providing significant coverage is needed. Source 1 is from allmusic, which, according to WP:ALLMUSIC "Listings without accompanying prose do not count toward notability". There is no accompanying prose that I can find relating to the album. The hrrecords site appears to be (according the citation) selling a vinyl version of the album, and as such is not independent of the subject. The bravewords citation seems reliable and good to use. I stumbled upon it during my before search and sort of ignored it after seeing that it doesn't show up on WP:ALBUM/SOURCE (which I probably shouldn't have). Your added citations contain only one source that count towards notability, one more source is needed for a GNG pass.  Just ' i ' yaya  06:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Relisting (final) after addition of content. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tygers of Pan Tang - fails WP:NALBUM Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect, and Merge whatever useful is in this article.Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Merge to Tygers of Pan Tang - currently only 2 sources seem good enough, which is light in my opinion. Jupiteralien (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Now meets WP:NALBUM with sources added to the article by Kingofstillport. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect or merge to/with Tygers of Pan Tang. Doesn't appear notable alone with its sources. Nythar T . C 20:44, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect: as above. A handful of scanty one-paragraph mentions (which say little more than "Wow that's cool") on obscure semi-blog sites doesn't equate to significant coverage on multiple sites with a reputation for reliability and fact checking.   Ravenswing      06:30, 8 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.