Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Lady of Bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Renaming is an editorial decision.  Sandstein  10:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

First Lady of Bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This post fail WP:NOTABILITY, this post is not official and as far as my knowledge, except Rowshan Ershad, none of President's wife hadn't even addressed as First Lady Bangladesh. It is a pure unnotable invention. So, I think this article should be deleted. Ominictionary (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:14, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 08:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep but rename to List of spouses of Prime Ministers of Bangladesh, and purge of all the "First Lady" peacockery. I have just added the page to Category:Lists of spouses of national leaders which has many similar lists. The lists are of encyclopedic value, since the spouses have an (often unofficial) public role. Unfortunately there a few editors who seem obsessed with imposing the United States title of "First Lady" on countries which use it neither formally nor informally. They even glorify the pages with infoboxes, complete with crests etc, to strengthen the false claim that these are formal titles. I have done some cleanup (e.g. First Ladies and Gentlemen of Finland moved to Spouses of Presidents of Finland and cleaned ), but many more remain to be done. However, the solution is cleanup, not deletion. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep-The subject definitely is notable. Suggest renaming to Spouses of Presidents of Bangladesh.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Spouse of Bangladeshi president hardly do anything or get any significient coverage. They are not notable topic. Thanks. Ominictionary (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 13:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - No professional historian or political analyst would advocate the deletion of this type of content. The role may be unofficial, but it exists, as do the individuals who have held it. And I also advocate keeping the unofficial title of First Lady here. Scanlan (talk) 02:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment:- A wikipedia article needs significant coverage. Can anyone show significant depth coverage for this article. Given citation in the article are all passing. So I would suggest my fellow editor who wish to vote keep, to present some depth coverage at the first place, in which bases wikipedia could think of keeping the article and then vote kor keep. Ominictionary (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously, a valid list. My very best wishes (talk) 23:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 05:36, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per BHG.Not being official is hardly a justification for deletion and many notable positions exist only by convention (e.g. most Prime Ministers in Westminster systems). A rename should be considered though. Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per above.UnteenthSense (talk) 03:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.