Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Minority Protestant Supreme Court


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 01:33, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

First Minority Protestant Supreme Court
Nominated for speedy deletion, but not a speedy candidate, so sending to AfD. I suggest merging this and First Majority Catholic Supreme Court into a single article on Composition of the United States Supreme Court by religion, which would surely be of interest to some. BD2412 T 18:11, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Vote changed to delete. In retrospect, Postdlf is correct - the Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States now covers this topic better, and the redirect, although harmless, would be useless. BD2412  T 22:48, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete POV fork and point scoring. Our Samuel Alito article has more of this bigoted nonsense too - this article is basically complaining that there are too many Jews and Catholics on the Supreme Court. Capitalistroadster 18:45, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as unencyclopedic. This is nothing but a potential statistic, and one about which nothing of value can be independently said.  Postdlf 18:49, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What more can be said beyond this one factoid?   [ +t, +c, +m,  +e  ] 19:09, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've started Demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States, which I think encompasses this information in a truly encyclopedic presentation. This can redirect there. BD2412  T 19:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Dalbury 19:35, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States. jengod 21:00, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment&mdash;Regarding "merging," I like the new SCOTUS demographics article, but I don't think this should exist as a redirect even if the "fact" contained in this stub gets appropriately mentioned there. Deletion is still the proper vote here, and will have no consequence on any independent editorial decisions regarding demographics of the Supreme Court of the United States.  Postdlf 22:24, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Agree. - Dalbury 22:37, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Jkelly 01:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. --Benna 02:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - Andyqaz 03:53, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Put the factoid in the demographics article but it's not so terribly significant as all that. David | Talk 10:01, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. --Russ Blau (talk) 22:33, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as the naming of this article borders on OR. Who would type that in? Jacqui  ★ 00:50, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.