Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Movement (Jumping Biz) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to the various album articles. Consensus in the first discussion as well as this one was clear, and there does not seem to be any further information to justify the recreation of the articles. These redirects should not be reconstituted as articles again unless significant extra information comes to light on the songs. The content of the articles themselves remain available in the page history if anyone wants to try their hand at merging the information into the various album articles. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

First Movement (Jumping Biz)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Recreated articles from redirect following previous afd discussion. Non-notable B-side songs; additional info does not make the songs any more notable since the earlier discussion. Info would be adequately placed into its album page or even the A-side article. Wolfer68 (talk) 21:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages as part of previous afd discussion for the same reason:


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Reinstate the redirects and protect them if neccesary. You already say it can be merged and if that is possible, it's preferable to deletion. Repeated recreation can be circumvented by protecting the redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 01:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, but I don't have that power. Since this was brought up to AfD before, I thought I would repeat the process. --Wolfer68 (talk) 05:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all: non-notable b-sides, recreated articles. JamesBurns (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: B-sides by a major act are in themselves notable, allow for further expansion
 * Redirect & protect These were not particularly notable when redirected the first time, and nothing has changed. I would also refer the commenter above me to the notability policy for songs. Unless songs have charted, won awards or have been covered by multiple singers, they're not notable enough for separate articles. Raven1977 (talk) 04:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.