Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Presbyterian Church of Port Kennedy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  16:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

First Presbyterian Church of Port Kennedy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not sure a church would fall under the guidelines of WP:CORP but there is no evidence of this church's notability. Valley Forge? Sure but not this particular church. Not even according to its own website. I don't even really know of an appropriate merge/redirect as nothing links to it. Travellingcari (talk) 00:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. A US church that has been in continuous existance since the 1840s. --Oldak Quill 01:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Either delete per WP:ORG due to lack of independent sources, or merge into Valley Forge National Historical Park on whose grounds the church apparently stands. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep A church that has survived its village being absorbed into a national park, has enough money in memorial funds and bequests to maintain it indefinately, and has 15% of its memebrs with over 50 years membership. Obviously important in its community. JERRY talk contribs 02:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment that may well be the case, but I don't see how it passes the guidelines for local organizations. Am I missing something? I don't see non-local significance and/or coverage. Travellingcari (talk) 22:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless third party references are found. A brief search by myself was unable to come up with anything. Capitalistroadster (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * try "port kennedy presbyterian church", "presbyterian church king of prussia" and the like. Also try news search for "Kelly G. Tucker"; You'll find information from 1936 that makes the church quite notable.  JERRY talk contribs 02:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know that a suspended pastor creates notability for the church. Per your comment above, it may be important in the community but I still find no evidence that it meets WP:N —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travellingcari (talk • contribs) 03:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep A historic church. Snowman (talk) 19:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, the church will survive this. Blast Ulna (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet our standards for notability and verifiability. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  14:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.