Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Sudanese Civil War

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 13:41, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

First Sudanese Civil War
As much as I understand the creator of the page... POV Lectonar 09:47, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * While there are several pages linking to this, and an article should at some point be written, this should be Deleted so that the red links return.   &mdash; Asbestos | Talk 11:00, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and list on requested articles. The article at time of writing appears to be a short bit of blather, some form of rant about their school, and a piece of irrelevant personal vanity. Average Earthman 12:56, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Turn it into an factual article. It would be an excellent subject. Everyking 21:46, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic POV. Megan1967 22:39, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd almost mark it for speedy deletion as a newbie test. --Deathphoenix 23:40, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. After deletion, this article should be listed on requested articles. Though it would be an excellent subject, starting over would be better action than trying to modify an immature and biased article. NeevaN 03:45, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup Gazpacho 06:16, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This should be kept as a reminder that no one has bothered to write an article on the First Sudanese Civil War. CPS 07:55, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * No, the redlink and the listing on requests is the reminder we need. Average Earthman 13:26, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, so someone will create a proper article. Jayjg |  (Talk)  20:02, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this, but we sure should have an article on this. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:58, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * I worry greatly about deleting this, crap though it is, because I fear it would set a precedent that could mean deletion of a legitimate article on the subject. I may write a stub on it later to see if that will change things. Everyking 03:03, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)