Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FishVille


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep as nomination withdrawn due to sources found by Marasmusine. Harry Blue5 (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

FishVille

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable game by Zynga. Only has one source right now. Yes, Zynga is popular, but that does not guarantee their games an article. Harry Blue5 (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

KEEP Fishville is a popular game and deserves some info about it. --Bluedude588 (talk) 22:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep FishVille, being a Zynga game, should bring back lots of sources...plus it has notability for being blocked by Facebook temporarily for advertising violations.  Raymie (t • c) 23:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and it had 875,000 users in its first two days alone. Raymie (t • c) 23:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Just because a lot of people play it does not make it notable. Newspapers and such that comment on how lots of people are playing it do. Harry Blue5 (talk) 08:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Zynga . It might become the next FarmVille, but it looks like its main claim to notability at this point is that Facebook wouldn't let you play it. 28bytes (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Switching to keep based on the Gamezebo and IGN sources provided by Marasmusine. 28bytes (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Found a review at Gamezebo (and further news on its suspension), editorial at IGN (and mentioned in other articles), and boom, that's WP:N isn't it? Marasmusine (talk) 09:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.