Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishbowl Inventory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 00:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Fishbowl Inventory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article appears to be purely promotional in content  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  10:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and copy-edit to remove promotional tone. The topic passes WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples of significant coverage in reliable sources includes:, , , . Northamerica1000(talk) 08:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - If it is kept, for how many more months will this purely promotional article remain on the wiki before someone comes along and copy edits it?  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  09:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If it really annoys you, that is why WP:SOFIXIT shows up as a strong recommendation. Editing pages is much harder than trying to delete it.  This may take years, not merely months and that doesn't matter as Wikipedia doesn't have to be 100% perfect and will still be around decades from now. --Robert Horning (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - It may need some copy editing and cleanup, but that is not rationale for deletion. If you want to put some cleanup notes with some specific problems asking for editors to help improve the article, that would be strongly recommended.  Otherwise, cite a specific policy point that this article violates that would justify its deletion from Wikipedia.  --Robert Horning (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am currently working on this article to bring up to Wikipedia's standards of quality. I apologize for not getting it quite right the first time. It's always a learning process on Wikipedia and anywhere online, really. Thank you for your patience. I don't think it will take months to fix this. I've already removed much of the content that could be deemed questionable. Robertlo9 (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have cleaned up the Products section, which appears to be the biggest problem on the page. Please let me know if those changes are adequate and if more are required. Thank you. Robertlo9 (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep but clean up some more. I deleted one paragraph that was contributing nothing to the article but promotion> — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.