Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisheries Science of Ukraine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Fisheries Science of Ukraine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable journal. Not included in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. A previous version of this article (“Fisheries Science of Ukraine” (scientific journal)) was deleted after an uncontested PROD. Randykitty (talk) 22:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Publications-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:15, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources, does not meet notability guideline. DeVerm (talk) 20:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better and the article insinuates nothing matchingly better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  23:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.