Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishmax fishing magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 20:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Fishmax fishing magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable publication Wuh  Wuz  Dat  01:14, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete As per nomination. Bluefist  talk  01:23, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - search revealed nothing other than promo material for this online site, even when using "FishMax" as the search term, which did generate a few more hits, but nothing supporting notability. Sea photo Talk  08:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per Seaphoto Peter.C  •  talk  •  contribs  14:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Comment - Article was nominated for deletion less than a minute after it was created. It never had a chance to develop. Having said that, it is hard to see how it could be made notable. Wavehunter (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply; its not the articles notability that is under discussion here, but rather the notability of the articles subject. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  06:54, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.