Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishpond

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 09:50, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Fishpond
Has anyone heard of this term? It looks non-notable and unencyclopedic. -LtNOWIS 22:05, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete, not I. dbenbenn | talk 23:24, 25 Jan
 * Delete, nor I. --Enigma 23:39, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only in terms of it being a pond with fish in it. I suspect this currently is only on the level of a private joke. Average Earthman 00:01, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably an inside joke.  -- Scott  ei&#960; + 1 = 0  00:22, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, inside joke. Bart133 03:09, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 01:56, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)