Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisk Black


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Character in a comic strip for which there is no article, and not notable because it has not received media coverage. Malinaccier (talk) 20:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Fisk Black

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Mainly because it is the main character in a strip for which we have no article. Hiding T 13:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the nominator. If there were an article on the webcomic, this could be included as part of it, but until then, this appears to be non-notable. Tnxman307 (talk) 14:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable as per WP:FICT. All articles about fictonal characters are only considered notable if they recicve third party real world coverage, hence this article is not considered as notable Printer222 (talk) 15:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 16:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- Hiding T 15:42, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. If the comic doesn't warrant an article, a character in the comic doesn't either. I have been unable to find any reliable third-party sources that discuss this character. GaryColemanFan (talk) 16:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The primary article about the webcomic itself has been speedied three times as non-notable web content. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.