Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiskartorpet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy close This is one of the strangest... Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Fiskartorpet

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Now, dont say i gonna g-6 delete it, Ok? Lack of notability, i think. Its my article, i dont want it deleted but i understand it maybe needs to be deleted anyway. The Rolling Camel (talk) 01:38, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You're nominating your own article? That's ... interesting. I think as it stands it's a delete, but if you have some local newspaper articles about the area you could add as references it'd be ok. --fvw *  01:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  02:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Despite the unconventional case of the article creator being the AfD nom, the Swedish Wikipedia Fiskartorpet article that's been in existence since August 2007 is extensive and appears sourced. I'm going to try to find more info on it and do some Wikifying time permitted. --Oakshade (talk) 03:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per Oakshade analysis. Here is an automatic translation of the Swedish article.  Linguist At Large  20:36, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep! Nothing wrong with it, just needs words and sources. The place is plenty notable, as the Swedish entry bears out. I think the nominator and the author of the article should meet outside after school and fight this out. I'm rooting for the author. Drmies (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha, the nominator and the author is the same! The author taked it here because he was afraid it didnt pass the notability guidelines. The Rolling Camel (talk) 22:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy close - This isn't what AfD is for. Stub tag it and see what happens. No reason to have this discussion unless someone other than the author initiates it. --Onorem♠Dil 23:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.