Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fit4D


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Fit4D

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphan article, self-promoting, not sufficiently notable, no real references CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 20:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as the articles says has been mentioned a number of times in the media, no significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 15:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable website. Media mentions amount to someone from the website getting quoted; nothing significantly about the website. --MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.