Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FitnessX Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

FitnessX Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

May not meet Wylve (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I haven't found any relevant sources to establish verification from third-party sources or notability, this is probably due to the fact that the company launched only a year ago. This may be another cause of TOOSOON. SwisterTwister   talk  02:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Article creation WP:TOOSOON, does not meet WP:GNG. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.