Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fitness culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 23:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Fitness culture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication, why the topic is encyclopedic. Seems to be more focused on personal view. Ireneshih (talk) 12:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 *  Speedy move to Draft Not sure this is an option but the title does suggest a broader appeal than just a personal view. It may be a synthesis, I suspect it is copied from somewhere, and the formatting is too far removed from standard - at the very least it needs a lot of work before it has a place in article space.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * There already is a Draft that was never submitted to review not to mention a further copy on User:Fitnessculture.  This article should be deleted.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:25, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Changed vote to Keep Still needs a lot of work but some editing has taken it beyond the draft versions.Peter Rehse (talk) 22:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose This article has many sources for the existence of "fitness culture". It's certainly a subject that is talked about in various publications about it in journals, books, and other forms of media. The article just needs to be fixed up. Iamozy (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Definitely keep After some editing, this article is much easier to read. "Fitness culture" is a notable subject, and I'm surprised there isn't already a Wikipedia article about it.''' -Iamozy (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - seems like good rationale and sources for this. -- Fuzheado | Talk 14:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.