Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five-Point Palm Exploding Heart Technique


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was 'MERGE with Kill Bill and redirect. &mdash;Wh o uk (talk) 10:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Five-Point Palm Exploding Heart Technique
Not only is this a pointless entry about a 15 second long scene of a fictional film, it also does not add any information(as there is none to be added) to the reader who follows the link from the original film's page thus making it redundant.


 * Delete Procrastinating@ talk2me 14:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I disagree, just because you think the the entry is silly doesn't change the fact that it does add information to the reader who follows the link from the original page. It clearly and concisely explains what the technique is and it explains it's background and usage in the movie. Therefore the statement "as there is non(e) to be added" is clearly wrong and demostrates only that you think the movie is silly and I don't consider that to be a valid reason to delete an entry.


 * Keep This is one of the main point of the film and a very memorable scene. I have come across it casually mentioned I think 3 times on the internet.  It is well worth a stub. --mboverload 06:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete The information presented is not encyclopedic and does not add sufficiently to justify a separate article. James_Aguilar (talk) [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25x15px]] 19:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep as per mboverload. Although I wouldn't object if it were merged into the main film article or some other article related to the film. Cassandra Leo 18:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete We can't have separate pages for every little fictional device in a film. This information is quite at home with a sentence or two on a page about Kill Bill. Trent 900 22:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete While this does refer to a certain detail of the film, this si an element that a viewer of the film will know. If you've seen, Kill Bill II, you should kow what the Five Point Exploding Heart Technique is.


 * Delete Everything in this entry can be gleaned from Kill Bill. -- samwyse 16:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge into Kill Bill. --webkid 01:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Well worth keeping separate. It will grow over time. --mdmanser 07:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Grow over time ?? from where? from what? this film contains no more data on the this fictional subject ! -- Procrastinating@ talk2me 12:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge into Kill Bill. RasputinAXP   c  13:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete This is not worth a separate entry, being only one short scene in a not particularly significant film. It could be merged into Kill Bill. -- John F 11:54, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and make a redirect to Kill Bill. possibly merge any relevant info. JoshuaZ 20:59, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Melchoir 21:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep - Richardcavell 22:16, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Kill Bill or Beatrix M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 22:46, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect with prejudice. Danny Lilithborne 23:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, merge, redirect...anything but keep, as this is redundant information. Thunderbunny 04:58, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Kill Bill. Stifle (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Kill Bill for reasons stated. :) Dlohcierekim 16:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per mboverload. - CNichols 18:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. We're being overwhelmed by a generally poor understanding of what an encyclopedia article is. — Encephalon  03:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.