Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Eight (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:03, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Five Eight (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After 6 years, WP:NOTABILITY not established. There is some indication of significance, but I do't think there's enough to establish notability. Boleyn (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Multiple pieces of significant coverage exist for this band and its work, including two profiles on NPR five years apart, an Allmusic bio and five album reviews , PopMatters , Chicago Tribune , and Orlando Sentinel . And there appears to be further coverage that I can't access behind paywalls in The Atlanta Journal-Constitution among other publications. The material on this group satisfies WP:GNG and WP:BAND #1.  Gong   show  15:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep - clearly notable. Source examples that provide significant coverage include:, , , . Paywalled sources include, but are not limited to: , , . Northamerica1000(talk) 02:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep the nominator's challenge has been thunderously answered by these proceedings. Chubbles (talk) 05:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.