Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Talents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 21:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Five Talents

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:GNG; lack of WP:RS. Article has nine sources (plus two 'further reading' entries): 2, 3, 4 and 9 can be discounted immediately as they are from the subject's own website. 5 is a very brief mention; 8 is a brief mention in a press release. 1 is from a questionable non-mainstream newspaper (see WP:NOTRELIABLE). 6 (BBC) is a dead link, and a search for the episode in question reveals it has been taken off the website (it can still be accessed on YouTube however). The program's description is 'The BBC's monthly charity appeal'. I'm honestly unsure how reliable 7 is, but in any case I can't find any information on the site which is more than a passing mention. As for 'Further Reading', no mentions in Christian Microenterprise Development. There is a possible mention in Development and Faith, but I can't verify how substantive it is.

The BBC source is the only one that would likely pass the definition of reliable; we need multiple reliable sources to meet the notability standards.  Tera TIX  13:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I found a substantial mention in a Washington Post article, so this probably does meet WP:GNG now; could someone close this?  Tera TIX  13:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.