Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five little speckled frogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep (no consensus), although I note that nobody mentioned that the article contains hardly anything else than the lyrics. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Five_little_speckled_frogs
Delete not notable song. Mahanchian 22:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep famous nursery rhyme. 16,000 Google hits even with quotes around it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Dsmdgold 02:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yes it's verifiable. But how/why is it notable or important enough to warrant an article? Contains no content other than the rhyme (unencyclopedic). -- Krash (Talk) 02:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. But I can't make sense of the notability other nursery Rhymes we have here. Froggy would a-wooing go gets 307 google matches and we have an article for it, while There Was An Old Lady Who Swallowed A Fly has 47,600 google matches and we don't have an article for it. Can someone comment on what criteria is being used on the Nursery rhyme page? Metta Bubble 02:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, established nursery rhyme. Kappa 03:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * "Wikipedia is not a mere collection of public domain or other source material." -- Krash (Talk) 01:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn -- Alpha269 00:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.