Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fixed font unix/:7100

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:12, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fixed font unix/:7100
Not sure if this is a speedy but sure looks like junk to me. Then again, I'm no Unix expert... I abstain due to lack of knowledge. Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 00:03, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) Delete -- Nonnotable Sysop exotica. Messages like this are a dime a dozen on server computers, and they are all different on different machines or op systems. This is a joke on wiki. So sez my en-gin-earng degree. Both of them. [[User:fabartus || TalktoMe]] 04:00, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Send to /dev/null ... Uh, I mean delete. Troubleshooting info for a specific error message. This is a good example of how useful information is not always encyclopedic information.  Transwiki if we have a wikibook on this sort of thing, else delete...  Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  00:24, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * rm (delete). --W(t) 01:17, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm pretty certain this kind of stuff is covered somewhere in WP:NOT. Mr Bound 02:20, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * /man rm?: Delete. Geogre 02:36, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not suitable for wikipedia. Poli 06:54, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wikibooks I'm sure they have soemthing on Unix. If I'm mistaken delete is also possible. Mgm|(talk) 09:13, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki if this can be cleaned up. JamesBurns 10:23, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikibooks if enough context can be supplied, otherwise delete. Anyway this doesn't belong in an encyclopedia.   &mdash; J I P | Talk 10:32, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not sure it's encyclopedic enough for Wikibooks. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs, Jamyskis 14:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * "Encyclopaedic enough for Wikibooks"? Wikibooks is a collection of free textbooks, manuals, and other instructional materials, not an encyclopaedia.  If there were a Troubleshooting Linux wikibook, this would be perfect for it.  Perhaps this could be a start. Uncle G 17:07, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to | here maybe? Rangek 18:28, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not useful enough for wikibooks.  It's a solution to a very uncommon problem that assumes an unusual system configuration.  --Carnildo 20:51, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A lot of work needed for Wikibooks... but this definitely does not belong in Wikipedia. --Rschen7754 02:02, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, do not transwiki. There's no need to dump this stuff on Wikibook's doorstep. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:54, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.