Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fixed tax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Lump-sum tax. Liz Read! Talk! 03:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Fixed tax

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I do not know much about taxes, but I believe this topic may already be covered by Lump-sum tax. I am not certain if they are actually redundant. What do you think? If so, I recommend a redirect to Lump-sum tax. HenryMP02 (talk) 01:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Economics. HenryMP02 (talk) 01:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to lump-sum tax per nom. Look to be practically one and the same. Aydoh8 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I believe this article is based on a certain essay or book from the wording, maybe we can ask the author to submit citations? I'm not familiar for topics that should be removed or not, the information on Australia present here is not mentioned in the lump-sum tax article. O.maximov (talk) 11:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.