Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fixedsys Excelsior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Fixedsys Excelsior

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable abandonware typeface. IP user removed my PROD tag. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 02:44, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I added a review as a reference. The lack of a recent update does not detract from notability. Once notable, always notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:43, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Lest I be misunderstood, my argument is that this was never notable, not that the time passing has taken away from its notability, I simply mention the abandonment because it being abandoned means it's unlikely to ever become so. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 03:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete But seriously? A "review" (if has great coverage of about 5,992 characters and renders tack sharp at 16px is called as such) on a Tumblr blog post? This is as close to WP:TROUT, and still far, far away from meeting anything close to WP:GNG which requires multiple significant coverage in independent reliable secondary sources. My search failed to bring any indepth reviews in reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:11, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, no Reliable Sources available for it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have not been able to find any sources. Mosaicberry (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.