Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fizzle Like A Flood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Tim Song (talk) 02:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Fizzle Like A Flood

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. This is technically a poorly referenced WP:BLP article, and I'm not entirely convinced it meets WP:MUSIC still either. Contested prod. JBsupreme ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 21:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - poorly sourced? But that's not a reason for AfD. It seems notable as a music article: albums produced by a real record label, album artwork from the same artist for the Beach Boys, a song used in movie - a serious band. Green Cardamom (talk) 01:35, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you're basing your evaluation on, this is poorly sourced BLP.  WP:MUSIC does not appear to be met either.  Yes, we most certainly do delete articles like this.  JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 01:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. The article is a BLP so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Keeping this article would interpret notability requirements too broadly and would seem to allow far too many garage bands and local artists to be included.  Chicken Wing (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have no opinion about the notability of this subject, but would like to point out that this sort of "opening the floodgates" argument doesn't hold water (I can't quite work out whether or not that is a mixed metaphor). This discussion is about this article, not about any others that may be created. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep – There are multiple articles about the subject, representing significant coverage, in the Omaha World-Herald; I've added two examples just now. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.