Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of the Southern Cross


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator; article rewrite renders deletion rationale invalid (non-admin closure). I42 (talk) 08:31, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Flag of the Southern Cross

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Quoting WP:FICTION: "The single most important rule about coverage of fiction on Wikipedia is that fiction is covered as a cultural artifact in the real world. We are primarily interested not in things that happened to imaginary people, but rather in the social impact that given works of fiction have - whether that impact be direct, cultural, or artistic. All aspects of an article on fiction must work to establish real-world importance, or to provide appropriate context for understanding real-world importance. Those that do not should be removed." This article clearly fails because it is only the poem. I42 (talk) 19:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikisource because the poem appears to be out of copyright, and Wikisource has other works by this author but not this particular one. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:14, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 02:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep after a rewrite. A notable work by one of Australia's most renowned poets, Henry Lawson. The poem itself should be taken to Wikisource. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment started a rewrite. For the information of others, the article looked like this when it was nominated. -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep per Mattinbgn. Rebecca (talk) 06:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.