Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flakiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg  jhp  jm  08:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Flakiss

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A quick search results in very few hits. A lack of sources indicate this artist has no WP:SIGCOV and may therefore not have WP:GNG general notability. The artist may therefore be an unsuitable subject for a standalone article. AadaamS (talk) 13:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Keep There is plenty of coverage already in the article, with Billboard covering her twice. She was also covered in People in Espanol, which I added to the article. She has significant coverage in multiple independent sources over time. She passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 04:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep as significant coverage exists in multiple independent reliable sources, satisfying WP:GNG. Bakazaka (talk) 00:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  M h hossein   talk 07:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG with plenty of coverage in multiple sources. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.