Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flamehaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

Flamehaus
The result of the debate was to recommend the article for deletion.--Fil e  Éireann 22:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Contains no information on (completely NN) subject. Put up as a joke by somebody I know (I'm ashamed to admit). Closedmouth 13:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Somehow survived Speedy. J.J.Sagnella 13:40, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Traffic Rank for flamehaus.com: 1,227,433  --  Ruby  14:28, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep it, its not doing harm - Suicidal_Banana
 * Comment user above has less than 5 edits J.J.Sagnella 17:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Ter e nce Ong 15:48, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The internet has lost it's soul :( keep it
 * Comment user above has less than 5 edits J.J.Sagnella 17:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * dont delete it- FATTYBEAR...THE MAN WITH THE PLAN
 * Comment user above has less than 5 edits J.J.Sagnella 17:11, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't delete it. - Popbob
 * Comment Above User has made no useful edits to Wikipedia. J.J.Sagnella 18:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't delete it. - MOSES
 * Comment user above has less than 5 edits J.J.Sagnella 22:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable forumcruft. The puppet show isn't helping its case for legitimacy either. -- Kinu  t /c  20:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per all above delete comments. Petros471 20:30, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not delete I've seen smaller and less noticable forums get by on wikipedia without any hassle of deletions, I don't see why Flamehaus should be an exception. True, it started off as a stupidity parade but I don't think that means it should be deleted
 * Comment user above has less than 5 edits, also care to state which over articles you're talking about?J.J.Sagnella 22:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Deletehaus as per above.--み使い Mitsukai 21:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence that this meets WP:WEB and sections of it are attack pages. Capitalistroadster 22:20, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:WEB.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:32, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Capitalistroadster &mdash; Graibeard(talk) 00:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete utterly un-encyclopedic. Camillus (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'd also like to point out that the IMDb message boards have over 8 million members, and they only get a cursory mention in the IMDb article, whereas Flamehaus only has about 40000 members. Hmmm... --Closedmouth 01:49, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. Nacon kantari   e |t||c|m 21:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.