Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flamel Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  07:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Flamel Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A CSD A7 was declined. No indication of significance or importance. Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH, article fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable, per nom. -- Scray (talk) 01:23, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 *  Weak Delete as lacking significant coverage from independent, reliable sources unless the article and its references are substantially improved before the end of the discussion period. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  01:44, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * References have been improved. The company is also mentioned in numerous books, but many of these books appear to either be books that simply list all drug makers that fit a particular criteria (e.g. all drug makers with new drugs in a certain market segment) or the coverage is otherwise not significant.  I have commented on the article talk page.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  19:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * NOTE: This article is one of around 62 mass produced from stock  exchange listings. All  either PRODed now, or those that  have run  their 7 days at  AfD have been deleted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Please also address comments at the talk page of the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.