Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flanaess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Alexnia (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Flanaess

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No Citations, notability not asserted, written in-universe, referenced by non-third-party books -TinGrin 17:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Legitimate spin-off article of World of Greyhawk. Edward321 (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable fictional locale. This is a good example of why requiring secondary sources for RPG material is not always appropriate; many of the referenced books and boxes are themselves notable within the context of RPGs. It should not be necessary to corroborate their contents externally in order to show that the fictional elements they promote are potentially notable. AlexTiefling (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep enough references to show notability. Things are of course notable only within their own context. That something needs out fo context notability is an inherent contradiction. DGG (talk) 04:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.