Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flarion

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Rje 05:48, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Flarion
Vanity. Not especially notable. &mdash; Trilobite (Talk) 16:47, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Vague and with unverifiable claims. Delete. Uncle G 17:46, 2005 Feb 6 (UTC)
 * Keep. It gets an impressive total of 81,000 Google hits. I've cleaned up the article with information from their website. This company seems to be making news all over the Internet. Unless someone with more knowledge of the telecommunications market assures this is just hype, I'm voting to keep. JoaoRicardo 19:09, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I find it amusing that when (aside from articles and prepositions) the only two words in common across the versions are "company" and "wireless", this is still "clean up" rather than "complete rewrite". &#9786;  You're too modest.  Much better.  Verifiable and specific.  Keep. Uncle G 00:34, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)
 * Comment. Thanks Uncle G and Samaritan. :-) JoaoRicardo 02:48, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Great catch JoaoRicardo! Keep. Samaritan 00:22, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable, needs expansion. Megan1967 01:38, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Thanks to the good work by Joao Ricardo. 220.244.224.72 16:36, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Oops that was me. Capitalistroadster 17:32, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. GRider\talk 22:10, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)