Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flashpoint (politics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Flashpoint (politics)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This article has not been improved in years. It should be deleted.Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of politics related deletion discussions. Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per the WP:NOTDICT policy. There used to be more details in the article but they were deleted (cards on table, by myself) as they had never been sourced. The article had been tagged as unsourced since 2009 (yes 2009) and no one was ever able to provide even a single source to back up an example. It's clear at this point that no one cared enough about that, so all we have now is a dictionary entry, and not a very good one at that. We're an encyclopaedia, Wiktionary can be found elsewhere. Canterbury Tail talk 22:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDICT. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 August 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 22:07, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, an unnecessary dictionary entry. Geschichte (talk) 09:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.