Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flashpoint Studios (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 11:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Flashpoint Studios
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Due to some events this past year, it has come to my attention that there are some articles and images regarding me and my former business on Wikipedia. And while eager and well-meaning, I believe a former associate of mine is responsible, at least in part, for this content. Both articles either contain some privileged information or general inaccuracies. I’m not really sure why this article even still exists. I would have to agree with the article’s notation of questionable notability. Flashpoint Studios, now discontinued, was simply a consultation and promotional arm of my core media development company. And while it is tied to some high-profile projects, it’s more of a footnote and hardly seems noteworthy to your global audience. And, it contains some inaccuracies and wording that can be misleading. Kevin carvell (talk) 22:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  01:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: User has also proposed that the Kevin Carvell article be deleted. undefinedHydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk) 06:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note - The Kevin Carvell AFD ended as Delete on 26 January 2016 -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  01:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as well because my searches found nothing better than a few links with "Flashpoint Studios". SwisterTwister   talk  06:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.