Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flat T'owt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 17:49, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Flat T'owt
Article on a &ldquo;newly created organisation that has almost 400 members&rdquo;  Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 19:13, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, although I was rather charmed by the site & idea it is nowhere near being significant/notable enough for its own article. Sliggy 20:50, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * It is a very well-known organisation here in South Wales, and is spreading quickly. May I ask what would make it notable enough? Lewispb 21:03, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-encyclopedic JoJan 21:15, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, doesn't seem to me to be non-notable. Stifle 01:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - 400 "members" and 16 Google hits does not seem very notable to me. Turnstep 16:39, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Now at 500 members, and growing quickly. Lewispb 21:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment reading the above, I realized that I did not completely explain why the article is here. Of the Google hits on this term, one is the web site of the group, and the other ones are signatures/etc. and similar uses of the term: they are not pages about this group. I think that here we have a big problem of verifiability. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 23:01, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete seems rather non-notable.  Grue   19:54, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete due to unverifiability and non-notability. Bring it back if you're still going in six months time and have received any coverage in mainstream media. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 10:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per OpenToppedBus. Peyna 05:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per non-notability --tyomitch 17:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.