Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavor berry

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 11:58, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Flavor berry
Hoax. Rhobite 06:49, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless there are notable, credible references. Zzyzx11 07:52, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a hoax-alicious delete berry. HyperZonktalk 16:59, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems hoaxy to me. – flamurai (t) 17:31, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This may seem hoaxy, but this fruit actually does exist. I saw it on a visit to Chile 2 years ago. There are plenty of strange fruits out there (dragon fruit comes to mind), so I don't think we should delete it.
 * This vote was posted by 141.150.221.216 (talk &bull; contribs); Nimrod (talk &bull; contribs) hasn't edited an article since 2003. – flamurai (t) 19:31, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Reads like a hoax, and the bogus signature (grounds for banning, by the way) only makes me think more so. Delete, barring credible citation. -- Jmabel | Talk 03:51, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.