Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleer Ultra X-Men Wolverine Cards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 21:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Fleer Ultra X-Men Wolverine Cards

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fancruft, does not meet notability Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I would suggest redirecting to Fleer Ultra, but that's a redlink, therefore... - The Bushranger One ping only 18:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Nomination is inaccurate, no explanation of how WP:ATD were considered and rejected. Jclemens (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It doesn't fall to me to explain how WP:ATD were considered and rejected, in fact I've never seen anyone do that. You're welcome to do that for yourself.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete while fancruft is never a reason to delete an article, I can't find much in reliable sources, including many of the trading card websites like Beckett archives. Secret account 22:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.