Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flesh and Blood (TV series)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Willing to userfy upon request. Nakon 01:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Flesh and Blood (TV series)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is not an upcoming television series (as stated). This is a television pilot which has just recently been ordered. Casting has begun, but a script is not even written yet. This non-notable pilot may never become a series. WP:TOOSOON Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Filming on this month and script WAS written. Television pilots is notable.--Alrofficial (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * My apologies, my mistake about not being written, but that does not make it notable. So many pilots never make it to air and never become series. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 15:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has many articles about unaired television pilots. This pilot made notable many publications on Deadline.com, The Hollywood Reporter and Variety. Per WP:FFILM, it has notability.--Alrofficial (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete If it's picked up in May, then we can have an article; right now as for all the pilots in-process for May, it's nothing but WP:CRYSTAL.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 00:44, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Userify - I recommend userifying this. The articles not bad and deleting it would be a waste of time, but notability won't be known until we have a definite yes or no to it being picked up.  JT dale Talk ~ 12:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.