Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleur Beale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 08:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Fleur Beale

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Mostly unsourced, can't find unvandalised or unneutral version in history. Sceptre (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, NZ Book Council site confirming awards, and here too, also this one, but I'm not 100% it's WP:RS, but it does cover off WP:V. Enough to pass notability per WP:CREATIVE.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 01:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   —Leonard( Bloom ) 01:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   —Leonard( Bloom ) 01:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Being unsourced is not a reason for deletion. I think she has significant critical attention with her nominations and awards, even if none of them seem to be major awards . Amalthea (talk) 02:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep given the awards, and now their documentation, I Suggest a SNOW close. DGG (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being unsourced is not a reason for deletion and in this case the article was sourced but not with inline citations. I have converted the references and footnotes to inline citations. &mdash;Theo (Talk) 06:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - she'd meet the criteria for author notability. She would have sold more than 5,000 books. Her story I am not Esther is famous. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and delete nominator. He obviously has never read a book and should not be editing here. Manhattan Samurai (talk) 20:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.