Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleur Watson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 19:19, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Fleur Watson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Keeps on getting her speedy removed-this almost comes across as a advertisement. Wgolf (talk) 16:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 *  possible keep ; probably delete She's young; it reads like an advertisement; was created by a SPA - which also took tags down. However, the shows she has curated got really nice coverage, and she gets more than mere name-checks .  SPA, User:Wong Siu Ming, if you are reading this, what is needed to keep this page up are profiles of and interviews with Watson in edited periodicals, covering her life and work in some detail.  If such cannot be found, then this article will be deleted as WP:TOOSOON. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Trivial coverage does not equate to notability. Most (or all?) of the links are merely the name mentioned.  Moondyne (talk) 03:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:35, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.