Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexPortal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jamie ☆ S93  00:32, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

FlexPortal

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Calling for a speedy delete, or regular delete if necessary since someone oddly rejected the speedy delete tag, for this clear spam article. Created by a clear spam account that was blocked, same user is clearly back under a new name. Tried prods but prod was removed by created of article (who also removed speedy delete tag). Article has no sources, is blatant vanity-promotional, does not try to establish notability, and I can't imagine a situation where this could possibly meet Wikipedia requirements of enough notability for a separate article. DreamGuy (talk) 14:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable software. Being adopted by the Montana Dept of Transport as part of some initiative does not automatically confer notability. B figura  (talk) 15:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- kelapstick (talk) 17:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I concurred with the CSD template. If i develop software that will be employed by Microsoft or Google, does that warrant a bio about me? Don't think so. Also, initial contributer had a clear CoI and Spam intent. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 17:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy as spam. Remove the contentless buzzwords, implementation details, and author namedrops, and there isn't anything left.  Importance isn't a criteria for G11s; even if it were, the claimed notability is both minimal and not backed up by the provided reference (which doesn't even mention the article subject). &mdash;Korath (Talk) 19:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * See this edit Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 20:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I saw it; that's why I brought it up. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 20:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - NN Company / product as stelthy advertising.    7   talk   23:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. But I don't think it qualifies for an A7 speedy, and it doesn't seem sufficiently promotional in tone to qualify as G11 to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note - FlexPortal's addition to Wikipedia is an attempt to clarify the difference between the product Adobe Flex and FlexPortal, since there is a significant amount of confusion as there are now Flex Portals built on Adobe Flex technology. I would argue that the Adobe Flex entry is significantly more commercialized than the FlexPortal entry.--Sparky1690 (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Above note appears to be by the editor who took over for the original author after original author was blocked, and may not represent an NPOV.    7   talk   22:45, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no coverage in reliable soruces that establish ntoability. I found this brief mention, and this press release. -- Whpq (talk) 17:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no secondary coverage, so doesn't appear to meet the WP:N guideline. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.