Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flexene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 23:30, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Flexene

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This product is not notable and lacks reliable sources. This article was tagged as needing verification over a month ago but no independent sources have been added. The only sources quoted are the inventor's and the promoter's site. The term "Flexene" is a trademark, not a generic name for a material and there is no evidence provided to demonstrate usage of the term. Ash (talk) 12:42, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Promotional article. Jujutacular talkcontribs 13:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SOAP, as it appears to be a promotional article. I don't think it's quite g11-worthy, but still a bit promotional in nature.  --Tckma (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article does look promotional in nature and does not justigy the importance of the material. Materialscientist (talk) 03:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.