Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexiLoans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. "Press mentions" are not by default an indicator of notability - they need to be substantial and independent as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

FlexiLoans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable tech startup. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR driven, passing mentions, and other WP:SPIP sources not suitable for notability. Created by Special:Contributions/Pooja_bhatiya currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts; please see: Sockpuppet investigations/Rohanpednekar38. Being on an "List of 100 Startups" strongly suggests that it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The page has credible non promotional mentions across various publishing houses & news websites in India. This is definitely worthy of being in Wikipedia. I may be using the same IP as mentioned in the note, however I am unrelated to the company or the IP. I strongly object to deletion. Please mention further reasons for users to take corrective measures. --Deepmehta0507 (talk) 05:05, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The business is credible and has noteworthy press mentions from major news publications. The article is trimmed to a severe extent to remove any unnecessary or irrelevant information. Please acknowledge and suggest further improvements.--Deepmehta0507 (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC) — Deepmehta0507 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:43, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * (Struck duplicate delsort entry.) North America1000 18:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The purpose of the article seems to be to promote the subject by giving it a page on the world's most popular encyclopedia. Most of the sources do not meet our reliability or independence standards, and most are simply repeating press release material about funding and acquisitions, and other incidental coverage.- MrX 🖋 12:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Nom's comment -- the sole "Keep" vote comes from Special:Contributions/Deepmehta0507 who has few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. both on the triple basis of lack of notability -- the refs are not truly substantial or  independent -- and on clear promotional intent and the creation by a paid editor. Any of the three would be enough reason.  DGG ( talk ) 06:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.