Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flexsim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete under criterion A7 (or maybe G11) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk • contribs)

Flexsim

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a company-endorsed advert, written entirely by a couple of anonymous contributers in a subjective, second person colloquial style that promotes the product, eg: "Improvements that previously took you months or years of trial-and-error experimentation to achieve can now be attained in a matter of days and hours using Flexsim." Article has also been entirely devoid of citations or explicit assertion of notability since its creation six months ago, and is all but orphaned. - Yeanold Viskersenn 17:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Either the product or the company may very well merit an article, but this isn't the article. Recommend deleting this advertisement, but with leave for someone to write, if possible, an appropriately-cited neutral article about either the product or the company.  Chromaticity 18:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and start from scratch. This article has spam written all over. --Blanchardb- Me  MyEarsMyMouth-timed 18:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I can't see that there is much, if any, useful content that can be salvaged from this. 86.154.79.131 18:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.