Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fliff Social Sportsbook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Fliff Social Sportsbook

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional article that was previously draftified, fails WP:GNG due to a lack of coverage that isn't promotional. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 01:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Pennsylvania. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 01:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet,  and Software.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cited to a bunch of thinly concealed native advertising. SI - This isn't an independent review; promotional call to actions everywhere: "signing up for a NEW account", "Join Fliff today", etc. Chicago Tribune  - "Fliff combines the excitement of sports betting with the camaraderie of social media", "Current Fliff offer", exclusively promotional. The Washington Post source is better, but it seems to be the only acceptable source. ~  A412  talk! 00:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Besides the Washington Post article, there isn't any other WP:GNG coverage present, either in the article or elsewhere. Let&#39;srun (talk) 02:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Letsrun. Only 1 decent source, and no evidence of anymore to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - very weak coverage, does not meets GNG. Bikerose (talk) 02:43, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG   -- Devoke  water  19:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.