Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlightMemory (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not a lot of participation, so I'm going to call this a WP:SOFTDELETE -- RoySmith (talk) 01:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

FlightMemory
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability. The article is about a website lacking sufficient independent coverage. Several of the references are primary sources. The only secondary sources are a couple of brief mentions, usually along with other similar websites. An article on a similar website Flightdiary has been nominated at AFD for the same reason. MB (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:51, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 23.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:37, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete- Take away the blog posts, home page, forum posts and desperate appeal to alexa.com, and the independent sourcing amounts to a bare two paragraphs of fairly routine churn. This does not appear to have ever been a notable organisation. Reyk  YO!  16:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions.  SST  flyer  07:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as I have found a few links so far but certainly nothing to suggest the needed notability. Delete at best. SwisterTwister   talk  23:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.