Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flight 73 (book)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Flight 73 (book)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet the notability guideline for books, and a lot of the content is a duplicate of the existing article Pan Am Flight 73. &#124; Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 11:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 11:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. MT TrainDiscuss 11:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete purely promotional article for a book. Neiltonks (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, possible speedy delete. Poorly-written and littered with redlinks, as well as failing WP:PROMOTION. Curious where saw the content as being duplicated, we could put it forward under CSD if that's the case. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 15:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I was meaning that the only factual content on the page was covering content already in existence at Pan Am Flight 73. Whilst I agree most of it is ads, I wasn't sure it was matching the strict criteria for unambiguous advertising. &#124; Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 20:35, 17 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NBOOK Hagennos (talk) 18:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Self-published without claim to notability. Blackguard  06:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not pass either WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.