Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Flind

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails WP:GNG, as it cites no non-primary sources. It also fails WP:PLOTONLY, as it provides no real-life context other than the publication history. A redirect to flint as an R from misspelling might be possible if this article gets deleted. Not a very active user (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. WP:GAMEGUIDE. Wikipedia is not the monster manual. -- Sirfurboy Emojione1 1F3C4.svg (talk) 08:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches bring up the usual array of primary, non-reliable, or trivial mentions of the creature, but nothing in reliable, secondary sources. Fails the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. DnD cruft. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.