Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip page


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  09:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Flip page

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 06:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Cliff  Smith 06:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

A dictionary entry followed by spam. Penyulap  ☏  04:18, 12 Jul 2012 (UTC) 04:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. I can't find any evidence that this particular skeuomorph is notable in its own right. On the other hand, I'm not convinced this isn't an encyclopedic topic, so it may be that my Google-fu isn't up to scratch. I doubt that any sources discussing this effect would refer to it as "flip page", but I don't really know what else to search for. DoctorKubla (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Has no reliable sources, and there is no indication this is anything significant. Stedrick (talk) 14:49, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not spam, but some of the links may be. Information is unsourced and probably original research, or is based on sources that do not appear sufficiently reliable for most of what is claimed. Remove this, and what's left wouldn't look like an article - it would probably be no more than a directory of external links. Peter&#160;E.&#160;James (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.