Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlippingBook (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

FlippingBook
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. Deleted few years ago, it was recreated or rewritten by a WP:SPA. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 14:53, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I've added the AFD box above saving everyone trying to find it manually. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article is still questionable for the applicable notability and there's nothing better convincing. Notifying the only noticeably active AfDer .  SwisterTwister   talk  19:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Still essentially commercial in intent. Carrite (talk) 02:53, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.